翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Entirely Beloved
・ EntirelyPets
・ Entirety
・ EntireX
・ Entish
・ Entisol
・ Entissar Amer
・ Entitative graph
・ Entitativity
・ Entities (album)
・ Entitled Opinions
・ Entitlement
・ Entitlement (fair division)
・ Entitlement commodities
・ Entitlement reform
Entitlement theory
・ Entity
・ Entity (2012 film)
・ Entity (album)
・ Entity (disambiguation)
・ Entity (netlabel)
・ Entity Abstraction Pattern
・ Entity Bean
・ Entity classification election
・ Entity component system
・ Entity concept
・ Entity Framework
・ Entity FX
・ Entity integrity
・ Entity linking


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Entitlement theory : ウィキペディア英語版
Entitlement theory
Entitlement theory is a theory of distributive justice and private property created by Robert Nozick in his book ''Anarchy, State, and Utopia''. The theory is Nozick's attempt to describe "justice in holdings" (Nozick 1974:150) - or what can be said about and done with the property people own when viewed from a principle of justice.
== Principles ==
Nozick's entitlement theory comprises 3 main principles:
# A principle of justice in acquisition - This principle deals with the initial acquisition of holdings. It is an account of how people first come to own common property, what types of things can be held, and so forth.
# A principle of justice in transfer - This principle explains how one person can acquire holdings from another, including voluntary exchange and gifts.
# A principle of rectification of injustice - how to deal with holdings that are unjustly acquired or transferred, whether and how much victims can be compensated, how to deal with long past transgressions or injustices done by a government, and so on.
Nozick believes that if the world were wholly just, only the first two principles would be needed, as "the following inductive definition would exhaustively cover the subject of justice in holdings":
:# A person who acquires a holding in accordance with the principle of justice in acquisition is entitled to that holding.
:# A person who acquires a holding in accordance with the principle of justice in transfer, from someone else entitled to the holding, is entitled to the holding.
:#No one is entitled to a holding except by (repeated) applications of 1 and 2. (Nozick 1974:151)
Thus, entitlement theory would imply "a distribution is just if everyone is entitled to the holdings they possess under the distribution" (Nozick 1974:151). Unfortunately, not everyone follows these rules: "some people steal from others, or defraud them, or enslave them, seizing their product and preventing them from living as they choose, or forcibly exclude others from competing in exchanges" (Nozick 1974:152). Thus the third principle of rectification is needed.
Entitlement theory is based on John Locke's ideas.〔Justice in acquisition: "Whatsoever then he removes out of the state that nature hath provided, and left it in, he hath mixed his labour with, and joined to it something that is his own, and thereby makes it his property. It being by him removed from the common state nature hath placed it in, it hath by this labour something annexed to it, that excludes the common right of other men: for this labour being the unquestionable property of the labourer, no man but he can have a right to what that is once joined to, at least where there is enough, and as good, left in common for others." - John Locke, ''Second Treatise on Government'', Ch.5 Sec. 27
Justice in transfer: "Again, if he would give his nuts for a piece of metal, pleased with its colour; or exchange his sheep for shells, or wool for a sparkling pebble or a diamond, and keep those by him all his life he invaded not the right of others, he might heap up as much of these durable things as he pleased; the exceeding of the bounds of his just property not lying in the largeness of his possession, but the perishing of any thing uselesly in it." - John Locke, ''Second Treatise on Government'', Ch.5 Sec. 46〕 Under entitlement theory, people are represented as ends in themselves and equals, as Kant claimed, though different people may own (i.e. be entitled to) different amounts of property. Nozick's ideas create a strong system of private property and a free-market economy. The only just transaction is a voluntary one. Taxation of the rich to support full robust social programs for the poor are unjust because the state is acquiring money by force instead of through a voluntary transaction. However, Nozick's ideas can endorse the creation of a minimal social program for the poor. Every person in the state of nature can achieve a certain level of welfare according to their own abilities. This level of welfare, while not equal, must be maintained via the Lockean Proviso. Given the justice of acquisition condition and the Lockean Proviso, "It is conceivable that in the normal operation of the economy, a private property regime might at some times, for some people, fail to provide access to this level of welfare when left to itself. If so, then justice — as the libertarian understands it — demands that the state act to correct the distribution of welfare generated by the spontaneous play of market forces." 〔http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/social-minimum/#2.2〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Entitlement theory」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.